Monday, October 31, 2011

CENSORSHIP, INC. - U.S. Firm Acknowledges Syria Uses Its Gear to Block Web


By JENNIFER VALENTINO-DEVRIES, PAUL SONNE and NOUR MALAS

A U.S. company that makes Internet-blocking gear acknowledges that Syria has been using at least 13 of its devices to censor Web activity there-an admission that comes as the Syrian government cracks down on its citizens and silences their online activities.

Blue Coat Systems Inc. of Sunnyvale, Calif., says it shipped the Internet "filtering" devices to Dubai late last year, believing they were destined for a department of the Iraqi government. However, the devices-which can block websites or record when people visit them-made their way to Syria, a country subject to strict U.S. trade embargoes.

Blue Coat told The Wall Street Journal the appliances were transmitting automatic status messages back to the company as the devices censored the Syrian Web. Blue Coat says it doesn't monitor where such "heartbeat" messages originate from. Computer code reviewed by the Journal indicates that Syrians were also using other Blue Coat products, raising questions about how the tools came to be used this way and whether Blue Coat has violated the trade embargo.

As Arab Spring political uprisings have swept the region this year, Bashar al-Assad, whose family has ruled Syria for more than four decades, has overseen some of the bloodiest crackdowns on protesters. On Friday, Syrian troops opened fire on protesters, leading to fresh reports of deaths. 

According to the U.N., more than 3,000 civilians have been killed in Syria since the start of protests.

Blue Coat executives say they don't know how the devices got to Syria. The company says it alerted U.S. authorities in recent days to the "improper transfer" and is cooperating with government inquiries.

"We don't want our products to be used by the government of Syria or any other country embargoed by the United States," Steve Daheb, Blue Coat senior vice president, said, in the company's first detailed explanation of the matter. He said the company is "saddened by the human suffering and loss of human life" in Syria.

The discovery of the devices in Syria shows the difficulty of controlling U.S. tech exports and demonstrates how regimes manage to use Western technology to censor speech and stifle dissent even when they are subject to trade sanctions. As the Arab Spring uprisings swept the region this year, security forces used Western technology in their often brutal fight to retain political control.

Egypt's secret services used technology from a British company to eavesdrop on dissidents over Skype. Col. Moammar Gadhafi's regime snooped on the emails and Internet chats of Libyan dissidents using invasive technology from a French firm. And across the Gulf, Internet-service providers have been relying on tools from Blue Coat, Intel Corp.'s McAfee and the Canadian firm Netsweeper Inc. to snuff out opposition websites.

Since 2004, the U.S. has prohibited the export, without a special license, of most U.S. goods and services to Syria. According to the Commerce Department, applications for licenses to do business with Syria since then have been "subject to a general policy of denial."

Many companies don't track where their technology goes after an initial, legal sale. Though the U.S. government requires re-export licenses for controlled devices, the rules can be difficult to enforce.

A State Department official said, "We are reviewing the information that we have and monitoring the facts as they come in" and "are looking into" the Blue Coat matter. The authority to investigate potential embargo violations involving technology in Syria falls to the Department of Commerce. A spokesman there said the department doesn't comment on "ongoing investigations."

The devices' road to Syria is still partly unclear. The company says it shipped 14 of its ProxySG 9000 Internet-filtering appliances from Rotterdam to Dubai in late 2010, an order valued at an estimated $700,000. It believes 13 are being used to censor parts of the Syrian Internet. What happened to the 14th is unclear.

Blue Coat says it received a two-part order from a Dubai distributor in 2010 that identified the end customer as Iraq's Ministry of Communications. Blue Coat approved the order and delivered the devices to the distributor in the U.A.E. The company says it didn't follow up on where the devices went from there.

The Iraqi Ministry of Communications couldn't be reached to comment Thursday. Blue Coat declined to name the Dubai distributor.

"At the present time, the company cannot confirm how the appliances were transferred from the point of shipment or from Iraq to Syria," Blue Coat's Mr. Daheb said. The company is "continuing its own internal review."

Some of Syria's largest Internet-service providers have been using Blue Coat devices since as early as 2005, according to a person familiar with the matter. The order of 14 devices was the largest in recent memory, but as many as 25 appliances have made their way into Syria since the mid-2000s, with most sold through Dubai-based middlemen, this person said. Blue Coat says it is investigating other possible unauthorized transfers.

Blue Coat began life in 1996 as CacheFlow Inc., which sold appliances to businesses that quicken Web-page delivery, among other things. In 2002, it changed its name to Blue Coat and reinvented itself as a security company.

The idea: Sell appliances that filter the Internet to protect big corporate networks. Today, that is Blue Coat's primary business.

The company has no corporate policy against selling to governments or Internet service providers engaged in censorship. Its devices block websites in the U.A.E., Bahrain and Qatar, a Journal investigation earlier this year determined.

Mr. Daheb says that "it is the government's role to set appropriate social policy and identify governments and entities that U.S. companies should not do business with."

Blue Coat's export-auditing system is focused on screening potential buyers before devices are sold, rather than on keeping track of devices once they are deployed, according to people familiar with the company.

Information about Blue Coat in Syria began to trickle out in August, after a "hacktivist" group called Telecomix managed to gain access to unsecured servers on Syria's Internet systems and found evidence of Blue Coat filtering. The group found computer records, or logs, detailing what Web pages the Blue Coat devices were censoring in Syria.

Earlier this month the group released those logs, but with all the Internet Protocol, or IP, addresses redacted for privacy reasons. IP addresses are unique numbers assigned to devices that connect to the Internet, often identifying location.

The Journal, however, has reviewed unredacted portions of the logs. The logs show the Blue Coat devices were filtering the Internet activity of individuals who were accessing the Web via Syrian IP addresses. The logs also include the serial numbers of the Blue Coat devices.

The logs offer a rare insight into what the Assad regime doesn't want Syrians to see online. Blocked sites include that of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, an opposition group banned in the country since it led an uprising against Mr. Assad's father in the 1980s, and the-syrian.com, a website dedicated to news about the uprising.

The devices blocked about 6% of the more than 750 million requests they filtered from July 22 to Aug. 6, according to a Journal analysis of the data. They blocked or monitored at least 26,700 attempts to connect to websites run by opposition figures or devoted to covering the Syrian uprising, such as all4syria.info and welati.net.

Visits to sensitive areas of social-networking sites were also recorded, but not necessarily blocked. Of more than 2,500 attempts to connect to facebook.com/syrian.revolution, for example, about 1,575 were blocked and 934 others were kept in the logs, according to the Journal's analysis.

Mr. Daheb said the devices censoring the Syrian Web don't have access to Blue Coat's main filtering database, which regularly categorizes new websites to be blocked by its software, such as pornography, gambling or religious sites. Blue Coat says it can't turn off the devices remotely.

The appliances do have Blue Coat service and support contracts. The company says it has now cut off contracts for the devices.

Also in the logs were indications that another Blue Coat product, PacketShaper, is being used in Syria. Blue Coat says it doesn't market or sell PacketShaper devices or software-which help companies keep computer networks running smoothly-in Syria due to the embargo.

The Blue Coat logs show that some people within Syria are also using a Blue Coat filtering product for personal computers, known as K9 Web Protection, which periodically interacts with the company's database of filtered websites. The K9 software works like this: When a person uses a computer with K9 to visit a certain website, the tool contacts Blue Coat to get information about the nature of the site and decides whether to block it.

It is possible, trade-law experts say, that such services could violate the U.S. embargo on Syria. "The executive orders this summer appear to be comprehensive," said Ronald Oleynik, head of the trade regulatory practice at the law firm Holland & Knight LLP.

Other software and service companies regularly prevent access from IP addresses in countries such as Syria. Google Inc., for example, does so for some of its software.

Blue Coat says its K9 software "may be eligible for export to Syria under exemptions that govern publicly available free software and informational materials incident to communications services." A person familiar with the matter said the company isn't sure and is awaiting word from U.S. authorities. In the meantime, Blue Coat's Mr. Daheb says the company has now revoked the licenses of K9 software to prevent access from Syria, "in an abundance of caution."

-Margaret Coker contributed to this article. Data analysis by Rob Barry and Ashkan Soltani.


Samsung Overtakes Apple in Smartphone Sales


By Tim Culpan - Oct 28, 2011 12:10 AM PT

Samsung Electronics Co. overtook Apple Inc. (AAPL) in the last quarter to become the world's largest smartphone vendor amid a widening technology and legal battle between the two companies.

Samsung shipped 27.8 million smartphones in the last quarter, taking 23.8 percent of the market, Milton Keynes, U.K.- based Strategy Analytics said in an e-mailed statement today. Apple's 17.1 million shipments, comprising 14.6 percent of the market, pushed the Cupertino, California-based company to second place. Nokia Oyj (NOK1V) maintained its third position, it said.

Apple, which released its iPhone 4S this month, held the top spot for only one quarter after dislodging Espoo, Finland- based Nokia earlier this year.

Samsung, based in Suwon, South Korea, has turned to Google Inc. (GOOG)'s Android software to boost sales of its Galaxy smartphones and tablet computers.

"Samsung has come out with products that appeal to all the different form factors and specifications out there," said T.Z. Wong, a Beijing-based analyst at researcher IDC. "That is a strategy they have executed very well."

Natalie Kerris, a spokeswoman for Apple, wasn't immediately available for comment after normal business hours. Nam Ki Yung, a Seoul-based spokesman for Samsung, declined to comment on the research company's estimate.

Smartphone Sales

"Samsung's rise has been driven by a blend of elegant hardware designs, popular Android services, memorable sub-brands and extensive global distribution," Strategy Analytics wrote. "Samsung has demonstrated that it is possible, at least in the short term, to differentiate and grow by using the Android ecosystem."

The global smartphone market climbed 44 percent from a year earlier to 117 million units, Strategy Analytics said. Nokia dropped to 14.4 percent from 32.7 percent a year earlier.

In the wider mobile-phone market that includes lower-cost devices, Nokia maintained its top spot even after losing 5 percentage points of share, the researcher said in a separate statement. Its 27.3 percent kept it ahead of Samsung's 22.6 percent, with LG Electronics Inc. (066570) third.

Chinese phone maker ZTE Corp.'s cheaper handsets helped it take 4.7 percent and overtake Apple for fourth place. Global market shipments climbed 14 percent to 390 million units, according to the researcher.

Samsung, also the world's largest manufacturer of televisions, today reported record revenue from its phone division that helped mask a slump in earnings from computer- memory chips and panels.

Legal Battles

Samsung rose 2.3 percent to 945,000 won at the close of trading in Seoul today. The shares have declined 0.4 percent this year, compared with a 25 percent jump for Apple.

Apple and Samsung have accused each other of infringing patents for technology used in handsets and tablets, with court cases still pending in Milan and Sydney. Legal battles between the two companies intensified after Apple claimed in an April lawsuit in the U.S. that Samsung's Galaxy devices "slavishly" copied the iPhone and the iPad.

Apple's profit last quarter missed analysts' estimates for the first time in at least six years after customers delayed handset purchases in anticipation of its new phone. Sales of the new model, iPhone 4S, surpassed 4 million in the first weekend of sales that began Oct. 14, topping Apple's previous sales record for its handsets.

Samsung and Nokia also released new handsets this month as consumers increasingly use mobile phones to surf the Internet, play videos and access social-networking sites.

Samsung and Google pit the talk-to-type technology of Android Ice Cream Sandwich against Apple's Siri voice-command digital assistant. Nokia, which has a partnership with Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), this week unveiled its Windows-based handset called Lumia 800.

To contact the reporter on this story: Tim Culpan in Taipei at tculpan1@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Tighe at mtighe4@bloomberg.net.

Read the story here: http://bloom.bg/vmrEjA

Netflix takes up 32.7% of Internet bandwidth


(Mashable) -- Despite recent troubles, Netflix is a major force on the Internet, accounting for 32.7% of peak U.S. downstream traffic, according to a new report.

Sandvine Intelligent Broadband Networks' report analyzed 200 Internet service providers in 80 countries and found that real-time entertainment apps take up 60% of peak downstream traffic, up from 50% last year. Netflix has more than half of that share. Sandvine considers the hours between 6 p.m. to 10 p.m. to be peak times.

Like others, Sandvine has also noticed a shift away from PCs to access such content. The company found 55% of traffic volume in North America is consumed on game consoles, set-top boxes, smart TVs and mobile devices. Only 45% is being accessed by laptops or PCs. Video makes up 32.6% of peak downstream mobile traffic, of which YouTube is the largest contributor.
Are Netflix's best days behind it?

The report comes as Netflix recently lost 800,000 paid subscribers in its most-recent quarter. The company's stock is now trading at less than a third of the amount it was in July.

Tuesday, October 18, 2011

FCC, CTIA agree on 'bill shock' plan for wireless services


CTIA, FCC agree on 'bill shock' plan
CTIA member carriers will send out free alerts to users about to exceed monthly limits

By Brad Reed, Network World
October 17, 2011 11:24 AM ET
 
Wireless subscribers should not be shocked if they start receiving text or voicemail alerts telling them when they're about to hit their monthly limits on voice, data and SMS.

That's because the FCC and the CTIA Wireless Association have reached an agreement where CTIA member carriers will send out free alerts to subscribers who are about to exceed their monthly service limits and incur overage charges on their accounts. In addition to sending alerts for users about to incur overage charges, the carriers will also issue alerts to users when they are about to incur international roaming charges. The policies are designed to help users avoid "bill shock," a term used by the FCC last year to describe large, unexpected overage charges that appear on users' wireless bills.

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski, appearing at a joint press conference Monday with CTIA President Steve Largent, said that carriers would offer the alerts automatically and consumers would not be required to opt in to start receiving wireless usage notes. He also said that the FCC would soon launch a Web portal in tandem with the Consumers Union advocacy organization to help users learn what kinds of alerts are offered by different carriers and to track whether carriers are complying with their own standards and policies.

While carriers such as Sprint and AT&T have already developed their own alert systems to warn consumers of additional charges, the deal with CTIA will not only bring more carriers into the fold but will provide a uniform way for consumers to understand their carriers' system for setting up alerts. And as Consumers Union policy counsel Parul P. Desai noted today, some carriers had been charging their customers to receive alert notices before the FCC-CTIA deal, meaning that the agreement to provide free alerts will save some wireless subscribers additional money every month.

The FCC has been working on ways to help consumers avoid bill shock for the past year. The FCC commissioned a survey last year showing that 17% of U.S.

cellphone users said their cellphone bills had "increased suddenly from one month to the next" even if they "did not change the calling or texting plan" they subscribed to. The survey also found that carriers didn't do a good job of contacting people when they were about to hit their monthly limits on voice or data, as only 14% of users hit with bill shock said that their carrier tried to contact them when they were about to exceed their monthly voice, SMS or data usage, while only 10% of users said their carrier contacted them after their bill suddenly increased.

Monday, October 17, 2011

Problems plague Apple iCloud, iOS launch


By Poornima Gupta and Jim Finkle
SAN FRANCISCO | Thu Oct 13, 2011 7:39pm EDT

(Reuters) - Apple Inc rolled out its new iCloud service and latest mobile software to a chorus of user complaints this week, after glitches led to email access problems and long delays in installation.

Some users reported losing their email access as Apple formally launched iCloud, an online communications, media storage and backup service, on Wednesday.

Apple's new operating system for the iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch -- iOS 5 -- also annoyed many users who encountered hours-long delays in downloading and installation.

Investors have high hopes for iCloud, which replaces MobileMe, a collection of Web-based products that have failed to impress critics or generate substantial revenues for a company that has had success in most other ventures over the past decade.

"It failed in a very nasty way in that mail sometimes vanished, sometimes appeared then vanished, and often there was a user and/or password-incorrect message plus some rather obscure additional error messages," said David Farber, a professor of engineering and public policy with Carnegie Mellon University.

"The behavior suggests program problems," added Farber, a well-known computer scientist.

But the iCloud problems are especially embarrassing for Apple, as the company introduced the new online service with much fanfare in June at its annual developer forum.

Co-founder Steve Jobs, who died last Wednesday, said "it just works" when he introduced the service in June. The software is key to the new iPhone 4S, which will be launched on Friday in seven countries.

The problems also come as rival Research in Motion deals with an international outage of its email and messaging services.

"Some users were experiencing intermittent authentication errors when trying to use mail," Apple said in a status update on its webpage for iCloud support. "Normal service has been restored. We apologize for any inconvenience."

Other problems Apple reported as having resolved included: intermittent slowness when signing in to iCloud, users unable to back up their data, and delays receiving verification emails from Apple.

Apple spokespersons did not immediately return calls seeking comment.

Users took to Twitter to complain about the problems during the roll-out.

"iCloud would be great if the email would freaking recognize my password," wrote Leanna Lofte, or "@llofte", on Twitter.

"Apple Mail's still offline, everything's out of sync here between my devices, and what a mess," Matt Peckham, or "@mattpeckham", wrote on Twitter.

(Reporting by Poornima Gupta in San Francisco and Jim Finkle in Boston; Editing by Richard Chang)